The management of the new generation shareholding

How do you design an equity program?

Written by Ambre Devis | Jun 25, 2026 11:40:50 AM

 

Employee stock ownership programs play a key role in attracting and retaining talent at startups. By sharing a portion of the value created with employees, they align the teams’ interests with the company’s growth trajectory, strengthen engagement, and foster a culture of performance.

However, implementing these programs can pose a significant challenge for companies looking to roll them out: how to allocate equity fairly, how to explain the program’s mechanics to employees in simple terms, which tools to choose, and what rules to establish in the event of an employee’s departure?

The goal is to design a comprehensive “equity program” aligned with the company’s strategy and values. Whether the objective is retention, performance incentives, or talent acquisition, clearly defining the program’s purpose is the cornerstone of its success.

 

A look at the key concepts of an employee stock ownership program

 

Grants

A stock grant, or “equity grant,” is a right granted to an employee to acquire or receive, under certain conditions and at a future date, a security that provides ownership interest in the company.

There are generally three types of equity grants:

  • Hire grants: As part of a welcome package, an employee may receive a certain number of shares (usually based on their job level).
  • Promotion grants: These grants are designed to retain talent. They ensure alignment between an employee’s promotion and their stake in the company’s success.
  • Refresher grants: These grants are used to re-engage and retain top talent. By offering additional equity at strategic intervals, companies reward and motivate their top performers.

Vesting Schedules

These grants generally follow a vesting schedule, often based on length of service with the company. The main idea behind this mechanism is to strengthen employee retention by linking the vesting of their rights to their tenure with the company: the longer employees stay, the more rights they vest.

Vesting is very often structured over several years (usually four years), possibly with an initial “cliff” period of one year.

In addition to a schedule, vesting may depend on the achievement of performance goals and the occurrence of specific events.

 

Grant and Vesting Criteria

A commonly used criterion for determining an employee’s vesting is their performance within the company. This performance can be assessed through regular evaluations, the achievement of specific goals, or contributions to the company’s overall success. Ultimately, the goal is to reward employees who demonstrate a high level of commitment and effectiveness in their work.

Finally, it is important to note that various events related to the company’s operations can also influence the vesting process (for example, an M&A transaction).

 

 

What are the key considerations when designing an employee stock ownership plan?

 

1. The Need for Communication

Transparent and regular communication is essential to a successful employee stock ownership plan. Employees must understand the allocation rules and their impact on their total compensation in order to fully appreciate the value of the shares they receive. A lack of clarity can create tension (particularly when employees leave), while effective communication strengthens the team’s trust and commitment.

 

2. Defining Grant Criteria and Frequency

Grant criteria are at the heart of an effective program. Role, tenure, performance: each package must reflect the employee’s contribution and development potential to ensure fairness and alignment with the company’s objectives.

It’s also important to consider how employees evolve over time. A one-time grant upon joining isn’t enough to maintain their long-term commitment. It’s therefore wise to consider implementing “refresher grants” or “promotion grants” to ensure continuity.

 

3. Choosing a Vesting Schedule

The vesting schedule is a powerful tool for retention and motivation. By structuring grants over time, the company encourages its employees to commit to the long term and develop a genuine sense of belonging.

The market standard is a 4-year vesting period. Some companies have experimented with one-year schedules featuring annual refresher grants, to avoid “holding back” employees who wish to leave. However, this approach has a limitation: overly frequent grants deprive employees of the upside associated with long-term appreciation in value.

👉 To learn more about best practices regarding vesting schedules for BSPCEs, see our article: BSPCEs and Vesting: Best Practices

 

4. Selecting the Right Legal Tools

In France, BSPCEs are the go-to tool as long as the company is eligible. For other schemes, or in an international context, specialized guidance is strongly recommended: foreign tax laws can hold some unpleasant surprises.

👉 For more information, we invite you to read our article “BSPCE vs. Other Employee Stock Ownership Mechanisms”

 

5. Establishing Rules in the Event of Departure

The market standard provides for a 90-day exercise period following an employee’s departure—which may seem short to someone who hasn’t been prepared for it.

To reduce this friction, more and more companies are adjusting this timeframe. At Figures, for example, the post-departure period is equal to the time spent at the company: an employee who leaves after 2 years has 2 years to exercise their warrants.

Active management of the program, combined with clear communication about these rules, helps minimize tensions and maintain good relations with departing employees.

👉 Want to learn more about what to do when an employee holding BSPCE options leaves? Click here!

 

Conclusion

A well-designed employee stock ownership plan is a major asset for attracting, retaining, and motivating talent. Clear communication, fair criteria, well-calibrated vesting schedules, appropriate legal tools, and predefined exit rules: these are all levers to activate in order to sustainably align employees’ interests with those of the company.

Since every company is unique, the challenge is to build a program that truly reflects its culture and objectives.