The 5 Mistakes That Can Derail a Board… and How to Prevent Them
Role confusion, a passive board, a rigid structure, lack of oversight, and no evidence of governance: how can these mistakes be avoided?
Key provisions, governance, transfers of securities, and exit: points to negotiate in a shareholders’ agreement, with practical advice.
This article is the result of automatic translation, the accuracy and fidelity of the translation are therefore not guaranteed. To consult the original version of this article, in French, click here.
A shareholders’ agreement is a key legal tool when multiple parties (founders, managers, investors) share ownership of a company, particularly in an LBO transaction. It supplements the articles of incorporation and serves to establish clear ground rules to avoid gray areas when interests diverge.
In practical terms, it helps define the framework for governance, information rights, share transfers, and, above all, sensitive scenarios (the entry of a new investor, the departure of a partner, or an exit).
The goal is simple: to secure the relationship over the long term, without creating a document that is too one-sided or impossible to enforce.
A shareholders’ agreement is a contract between the signatories, in addition to the bylaws (statuts), and is often confidential.
It is used to govern governance, rights (information rights, veto rights, etc.), and share transfers (pre-emption rights, approval/consent clauses, drag/tag, etc.).
Watch-out: anything that needs to be enforceable against everyone often must also be included in the bylaws (to be calibrated case by case).
Before signing: clarify your “non-negotiables,” list risk scenarios, and check consistency between the shareholders’ agreement and the bylaws.
The agreement often includes specific clauses designed to structure the exercise of power within the company, control capital dilution, retain key executives, and plan for investors’ exits. Before beginning to draft the agreement, it is essential to identify which points are non-negotiable and which are open to discussion.
Furthermore, anticipating adverse scenarios—such as the departure, disability, or death of a shareholder—is essential to ensuring the company’s stability and guaranteeing that no key provisions are omitted.
When drafting a shareholders’ agreement, it is important to ensure that it strikes a balance among the signatories and does not create tension. Above all, it must serve as a tool for bringing shareholders together and reconciling their divergent interests.
It is essential to avoid including clauses that are too rigid or restrictive, as they can be counterproductive and lead to disputes. It is also important to establish clear procedures for each issue addressed to minimize the risk of misinterpretation or dispute.
A shareholders’ agreement is generally structured around four main categories of clauses:
These clauses form the foundation of the shareholders’ agreement and are essential for its proper execution. They define the terms of the agreement and provide clarity in its wording, thereby minimizing the risk of disputes.
Clauses relating to corporate governance and operations are essential to ensuring harmonious and balanced management. It is crucial to avoid any imbalance between seasoned investors and less experienced founders, thereby allowing the CEO to set boundaries and prevent decisions—particularly operational ones—from being imposed on them.
These provisions aim to control the capital structure and protect existing shareholders by limiting or prohibiting certain transfers of shares in specific situations. In particular, it is essential to include exit clauses to manage investor departures. These clauses require a detailed understanding on the part of management of the various classes of shares and their associated rights.
These clauses target certain shareholders who perform essential operational functions within the company, imposing obligations on them or granting them specific rights.
Unlike the articles of incorporation, the shareholders’ agreement is a private contract that is binding only on its signatories. Consequently, it is generally unenforceable against third parties, meaning that the obligations and rights stipulated in the agreement cannot be imposed on those who have not signed it.
In the context of a company with numerous investors, it may be prudent to limit the inclusion of all investors in the main agreement. A practical approach is to create separate “mini-agreements,” reserving the main agreement for the founders and a small group of key investors, while employees and small business angels are included through separate agreements. This strategy allows for the effective management of relationships among the various stakeholders while maintaining the confidentiality and flexibility of the shareholders’ agreement.
Extra-statutory agreements offer considerable flexibility in defining relationships among shareholders while maintaining confidentiality. However, this freedom comes with certain limitations:
Careful drafting of a shareholders’ agreement is essential during an LBO transaction. This document plays a key role in structuring relationships among shareholders, defining their rights, and preventing potential conflicts.
It is essential to include specific provisions in the articles of incorporation or in the shareholders’ agreement to ensure smooth management and avoid any future ambiguity.
It’s an agreement (a contract) entered into between partners/shareholders, in addition to the bylaws (statuts), to organize governance, rights, and share transfers—often on a confidential basis.
Generally no—it’s an optional tool. It becomes especially relevant as soon as there are several stakeholders with different interests (investors, management, corporates, etc.).
The shareholders’ agreement is useful for confidentiality and detail. The bylaws set out the “public” framework that is enforceable against third parties. The right split depends on the corporate form and the objective (enforceability, confidentiality, implementation).
Role confusion, a passive board, a rigid structure, lack of oversight, and no evidence of governance: how can these mistakes be avoided?
Find out how to put together your first board: size, profiles, roles, compensation, and the first meeting.
How to integrate freelancers and employees under umbrella companies into share ownership programs?