LBO shareholders' agreement: key clauses (governance, liquidity, anti-dilution, exit), sensitive negotiation points and mistakes to avoid.
This article is the result of automatic translation, the accuracy and fidelity of the translation are therefore not guaranteed. To consult the original version of this article, in French, click here.
A shareholders’ agreement is a key legal tool when multiple parties (founders, managers, investors) share ownership of a company, particularly in an LBO transaction. It supplements the articles of incorporation and serves to establish clear ground rules to avoid gray areas when interests diverge.
In practical terms, it helps define the framework for governance, information rights, share transfers, and, above all, sensitive scenarios (the entry of a new investor, the departure of a partner, or an exit).
The goal is simple: to secure the relationship over the long term, without creating a document that is too one-sided or impossible to enforce.
A shareholders’ agreement is a contract between the signatories, in addition to the bylaws (statuts), and is often confidential.
It is used to govern governance, rights (information rights, veto rights, etc.), and share transfers (pre-emption rights, approval/consent clauses, drag/tag, etc.).
Watch-out: anything that needs to be enforceable against everyone often must also be included in the bylaws (to be calibrated case by case).
Before signing: clarify your “non-negotiables,” list risk scenarios, and check consistency between the shareholders’ agreement and the bylaws.
The agreement often includes specific clauses designed to structure the exercise of power within the company, control capital dilution, retain key executives, and plan for investors’ exits. Before beginning to draft the agreement, it is essential to identify which points are non-negotiable and which are open to discussion.
Furthermore, anticipating adverse scenarios—such as the departure, disability, or death of a shareholder—is essential to ensuring the company’s stability and guaranteeing that no key provisions are omitted.
When drafting a shareholders’ agreement, it is important to ensure that it strikes a balance among the signatories and does not create tension. Above all, it must serve as a tool for bringing shareholders together and reconciling their divergent interests.
It is essential to avoid including clauses that are too rigid or restrictive, as they can be counterproductive and lead to disputes. It is also important to establish clear procedures for each issue addressed to minimize the risk of misinterpretation or dispute.
A shareholders’ agreement is generally structured around four main categories of clauses:
These clauses form the foundation of the shareholders’ agreement and are essential for its proper execution. They define the terms of the agreement and provide clarity in its wording, thereby minimizing the risk of disputes.
Clauses relating to corporate governance and operations are essential to ensuring harmonious and balanced management. It is crucial to avoid any imbalance between seasoned investors and less experienced founders, thereby allowing the CEO to set boundaries and prevent decisions—particularly operational ones—from being imposed on them.
These provisions aim to control the capital structure and protect existing shareholders by limiting or prohibiting certain transfers of shares in specific situations. In particular, it is essential to include exit clauses to manage investor departures. These clauses require a detailed understanding on the part of management of the various classes of shares and their associated rights.
These clauses target certain shareholders who perform essential operational functions within the company, imposing obligations on them or granting them specific rights.
Unlike the articles of incorporation, the shareholders’ agreement is a private contract that is binding only on its signatories. Consequently, it is generally unenforceable against third parties, meaning that the obligations and rights stipulated in the agreement cannot be imposed on those who have not signed it.
In the context of a company with numerous investors, it may be prudent to limit the inclusion of all investors in the main agreement. A practical approach is to create separate “mini-agreements,” reserving the main agreement for the founders and a small group of key investors, while employees and small business angels are included through separate agreements. This strategy allows for the effective management of relationships among the various stakeholders while maintaining the confidentiality and flexibility of the shareholders’ agreement.
Extra-statutory agreements offer considerable flexibility in defining relationships among shareholders while maintaining confidentiality. However, this freedom comes with certain limitations:
Careful drafting of a shareholders’ agreement is essential during an LBO transaction. This document plays a key role in structuring relationships among shareholders, defining their rights, and preventing potential conflicts.
It is essential to include specific provisions in the articles of incorporation or in the shareholders’ agreement to ensure smooth management and avoid any future ambiguity.
A shareholders' agreement is not legally mandatory, but in practice it is essential. It governs the relationship between the LBO fund, the management team, and any co-investors by setting out the rules on corporate governance, voting rights, exit arrangements, and anti-dilution protections. Without a shareholders' agreement, the default provisions of corporate law apply, which is rarely in the management team's best interests.
The main provisions include: pre-emption rights (giving existing shareholders priority to purchase shares before they are sold to a third party), tag-along rights (allowing minority shareholders to sell their shares alongside the fund on the same terms), drag-along rights (requiring shareholders to sell if the fund sells its stake), governance provisions (such as board composition and veto rights), and management exit provisions (including good leaver/bad leaver clauses). Together, these provisions define the economic and governance framework of the transaction for management.
A pre-emption right gives certain shareholders the first opportunity to purchase shares that another shareholder intends to sell before those shares can be transferred to a third party. A tag-along right allows a minority shareholder to participate in a sale initiated by a majority shareholder and sell their shares on the same terms and at the same price. These mechanisms are complementary: pre-emption rights provide protection before a third-party sale takes place, while tag-along rights protect minority shareholders when such a sale occurs.
Yes. A shareholders' agreement may be amended by mutual agreement, provided that all parties to the agreement consent to the changes. In practice, amendments typically occur following a capital increase, a corporate restructuring, or a significant change in the relationship between the fund and the management team. Any amendment should be reviewed by specialized legal counsel to avoid inconsistencies or conflicting provisions.
The consequences depend on the remedies provided in the agreement itself and may include invalidation of the share transfer, damages, penalty payments, or specific enforcement of a purchase or sale undertaking. French courts generally uphold the validity of shareholders' agreements and sanction breaches of their provisions. In practice, LBO shareholders' agreements frequently include dispute resolution mechanisms—such as mediation or arbitration—before any court proceedings are initiated.
Startup secondary market: when and how to organize a liquidity window for your employees without undermining your equity story.
Selecting an LBO fund: selection criteria, fund expectations, pitch and positioning. How to target and attract the right investment partners.
BSPCE plan in 4 steps: shareholders' meeting, drafting the plan rules, signing warrants and updating the register. Full checklist.